Protecting your private information is our priority. This Statement of Privacy applies to the www.ejustice.com and governs data collection and usage. For the purposes of this Privacy Policy, unless otherwise noted, all references to eJustice, Inc., include www.ejustice.com and eJustice. This eJustice owned and operated website is a marketing services company for the legal industry to facilitate advertising-related services for lawyers, law firms and related entities. By using this eJustice website, you consent to the data practices described in this statement.
Collection of your Personal Information
eJustice may collect personally identifiable information, such as your name. If you purchase eJustice s products and services, we collect billing and credit card information. This information is used to complete the purchase transaction. We may gather additional personal or non-personal information in the future.
Information about your computer hardware and software may be automatically collected by eJustice. This information can include: your IP address, browser type, domain names, access times and referring website addresses. This information is used for the operation of the service, to maintain quality of the service, and to provide general statistics regarding use of the eJustice website.
eJustice encourages you to review the privacy statements of websites you choose to link to from eJustice so that you can understand how those websites collect, use and share your information. eJustice is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content on websites outside of the eJustice website.
Use of your Personal Information
eJustice collects and uses your personal information to operate its website(s) and deliver the services you have requested.
eJustice may also use your personally identifiable information to inform you of other products or services available from eJustice and its affiliates. eJustice may also contact you via surveys to conduct research about your opinion of current services or of potential new services that may be offered.
eJustice does not sell, rent or lease its customer lists to third parties.
eJustice may share data with trusted partners to help perform statistical analysis, send you email or postal mail, provide customer support, or arrange for deliveries. All such third parties are prohibited from using your personal information except to provide these services to eJustice, and they are required to maintain the confidentiality of your information.
eJustice may keep track of the websites and pages our users visit within eJustice, in order to determine what eJustice services are the most popular. This data is used to deliver customized content and advertising within eJustice to customers whose behavior indicates that they are interested in a particular subject area.
eJustice will disclose your personal information, without notice, only if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on eJustice or the site; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of eJustice; and, (c) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of eJustice, or the public.
Use of Cookies
The eJustice website may use “cookies” to help you personalize your online experience. A cookie is a text file that is placed on your hard disk by a web page server. Cookies cannot be used to run programs or deliver viruses to your computer. Cookies are uniquely assigned to you, and can only be read by a web server in the domain that issued the cookie to you.
One of the primary purposes of cookies is to provide a convenience feature to save you time. The purpose of a cookie is to tell the Web server that you have returned to a specific page. For example, if you personalize eJustice pages, or register with eJustice site or services, a cookie helps eJustice to recall your specific information on subsequent visits. This simplifies the process of recording your personal information, such as billing addresses, shipping addresses, and so on. When you return to the same eJustice website, the information you previously provided can be retrieved, so you can easily use the eJustice features that you customized.
You have the ability to accept or decline cookies. Most Web browsers automatically accept cookies, but you can usually modify your browser setting to decline cookies if you prefer. If you choose to decline cookies, you may not be able to fully experience the interactive features of the eJustice services or websites you visit.
Security of your Personal Information
eJustice secures your personal information from unauthorized access, use or disclosure. When personal information (such as a credit card number) is transmitted to other websites, it is protected through the use of encryption, such as the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol.
Children Under Thirteen
eJustice does not knowingly collect personally identifiable information from children under the age of thirteen. If you are under the age of thirteen, you must ask your parent or guardian for permission to use this website.
Opt-Out & Unsubscribe
We respect your privacy and give you an opportunity to opt-out of receiving announcements of certain information. Users may opt-out of receiving any or all communications from eJustice by contacting us here:
– Email: info@ejustice.com
– Phone: 888-215-7834
Changes to this Statement
eJustice will occasionally update this Statement of Privacy to reflect company and customer feedback. eJustice encourages you to periodically review this Statement to be informed of how eJustice is protecting your information.
Contact Us
eJustice welcomes your questions or comments regarding this Statement of Privacy:
Ejustice, Inc.
543 Encinitas Blvd. Suite 111
Encinitas, California 92024
Email Address:
info@ejustice.com
Telephone number:
888-215-7834
Effective as of June 1, 2019
Pesticides have long been known to have neurotoxic effects on individuals exposed to high quantities of the chemicals, and there have been increasing concerns about the potential delayed effects of chlorpyrifos exposure on the brains of children exposed to the organophosphate pesticide in utero.
Most birth defects that we know of are linked to genetic or environmental causes, including exposure of pregnant women to pesticides, and chlorpyrifos exposure has been linked to serious birth defects like developmental delays, reduced brain function, brain damage, lower IQs, ADHD and autism spectrum disorder.
Chlorpyrifos has been one of the most widely used pesticides in the United States for decades, despite the potential for the organophosphateto damage the nervous system of a developing fetus. If your child was born with brain damage or another serious birth defect, and you believe chlorpyrifos exposure to be the cause, your family may have grounds to file a birth defect lawsuit against Dow Chemical Co.
Chlorpyrifos is the active ingredient in Dursban and Lorsban, broad-spectrum organophosphate insecticides widely used on a number of food and feed crops to control foliage and soil-borne insects.
Chlorpyrifos has both agricultural uses – commonly sprayed on corn, soybeans, fruit and nut trees, cranberries, broccoli, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts and other row crops – and non-agricultural uses – sprayed on everything from golf courses, turf and Christmas trees to utility poles and fence posts. Categorized as an organophosphate, chlorpyrifos kills insects by interfering with an enzyme that is essential to the function of the nervous system. Chlorpyrifos attacks the nervous system of insects in the same way that sarin gas kills humans, and despite claims that exposure to the pesticide is safe in small doses, chlorpyrifos has been linked to serious birth defects in babies born to mothers exposed to the pesticide during pregnancy, including brain damage, loss of intellect, lowered IQ and developmental delays.
Since chlorpyrifos, marketed by Dow Chemical Co., became the most widely used insect killer in the United States, there have been a number of measures to eliminate, phase out and modify certain uses of the pesticide. In 1996, more stringent safety standards were enacted to address certain health and environmental risks from exposure to the pesticide, especially among children. In 2000, most home uses of chlorpyrifos were discontinued, and in 2002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) updated the chlorpyrifos label to include improved safety measures to protect the environment and individuals applying the pesticide. In 2014, the EPA completed a revised human health risk assessment for chlorpyrifos use, factoring in exposures from inhaling the pesticide, direct contact with skin and exposures from food and water among all populations, including women of childbearing age.
“In 1995, the EPA fined Dow Chemical $732,000 for withholding information about more than 200 reports of poisonings related to chlorpyrifos, and five years later, the company eliminated the use of chlorpyrifos in household products. Then, in 2003, Dow was ordered to pay a $2 million penalty for illegally making false safety claims about its pesticide products in advertisements that aired between 1995 and 2003.”
Chlorpyrifos has been used as a pesticide in the United States since 1965, and the current chlorpyrifos label requires workers handling and applying the pesticide to wear additional protective equipment and avoid entering treated fields for between 24 hours and five days. According to the EPA, chlorpyrifos can cause cholinesterase inhibition in humans, meaning the pesticide can overstimulate the nervous system and cause symptoms like dizziness, nausea, confusion, and at exceptionally high exposures, possibly even respiratory paralysis and death.
Although in-home use of chlorpyrifos has been restricted since 2000, the pesticide is still widely used in agriculture and poses a serious risk for individuals who work in or live in close proximity to fields sprayed with chlorpyrifos. Perhaps most concerning is the potential for women exposed to chlorpyrifos during pregnancy to give birth to babies with inhibited fetal brain development. According to reports, chlorpyrifos exposure in utero can result in the following birth defects:
In one study published in 2012, researchers wrote that “Prenatal exposure to chlorpyrifos (CPF), an organophosphate insecticide, is associated with neurobehavioral deficits in humans and animal models.” According to the findings of that study, there were “significant associations of prenatal exposure to a widely used environmental neurotoxicant, at standard use levels, with structural changes in the developing human brain.”
In 2014, an article published in The Atlantic wrote, “Forty-one million IQ points. That’s what Dr. David Bellinger determined Americans have collectively forfeited as a result of exposure to lead, mercury, and organophosphate pesticides.” According to the article, which quoted a 2012 paper comparing intelligence quotients (IQs) among children whose mothers were exposed to these neurotoxins during pregnancy, exposure to organophosphates like chlorpyrifos account for a total loss of 16.9 million IQ points.
Despite significant efforts in recent years to ban the potentially hazardous pesticide in the United States, chlorpyrifos is still allowed in agriculture, even though the pesticide is classified as “very highly toxic” to freshwater fish and birds, “moderately toxic” to mammals, and capable of causing “structural changes in the developing human brain.”
And while farmworkers and families living in close proximity to fields sprayed with chlorpyrifos are just now learning about the potential for the pesticide to cause birth defects in babies exposed to chlorpyrifos in utero, Dow Chemical has known for decades about the health risks of chlorpyrifos exposure. In 1995, the EPA fined Dow Chemical $732,000 for withholding information about more than 200 reports of poisonings related to chlorpyrifos, and five years later, the company eliminated the use of chlorpyrifos in household products. Then, in 2003, Dow was ordered to pay a $2 million penalty for illegally making false safety claims about its pesticide products in advertisements that aired between 1995 and 2003.
Still, chlorpyrifos continued to be heavily applied in agricultural and commercial uses in the United States for years, exposing adults, children and developing fetuses alike to adverse side effects. In 2018, a three-judge panel finally ordered the EPA to ban chlorpyrifos use in the United States within 60 days. However, the EPA appealed the decision and the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is now reconsidering the ruling.
eJustice offers a wide variety of web 2.0 and 3.0 services that result in highly qualified users, leads and cases.
Web 2.0 is defined as the 2nd generation of website design, development and is characterized as promoting easier and better ways of interaction, interoperability, collaboration and communication.
Web 3.0 is the development of high quality content and services created using Web 2.0 technology as an enabling platform.
Basically making the 2.0 product better, by taking its application and evolving it with new features and interactivity , awareness, and intelligence.
With our web 3.0 services we can make your site and campaigns better resulting in better experiences and ultimately better results for your firm
Pesticides have long been known to have neurotoxic effects on individuals exposed to high quantities of the chemicals, and there have been increasing concerns about the potential delayed effects of chlorpyrifos exposure on the brains of children exposed to the organophosphate pesticide in utero.
Most birth defects that we know of are linked to genetic or environmental causes, including exposure of pregnant women to pesticides, and chlorpyrifos exposure has been linked to serious birth defects like developmental delays, reduced brain function, brain damage, lower IQs, ADHD and autism spectrum disorder.
Chlorpyrifos has been one of the most widely used pesticides in the United States for decades, despite the potential for the organophosphateto damage the nervous system of a developing fetus. If your child was born with brain damage or another serious birth defect, and you believe chlorpyrifos exposure to be the cause, your family may have grounds to file a birth defect lawsuit against Dow Chemical Co.
Chlorpyrifos is the active ingredient in Dursban and Lorsban, broad-spectrum organophosphate insecticides widely used on a number of food and feed crops to control foliage and soil-borne insects.
Chlorpyrifos has both agricultural uses – commonly sprayed on corn, soybeans, fruit and nut trees, cranberries, broccoli, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts and other row crops – and non-agricultural uses – sprayed on everything from golf courses, turf and Christmas trees to utility poles and fence posts. Categorized as an organophosphate, chlorpyrifos kills insects by interfering with an enzyme that is essential to the function of the nervous system. Chlorpyrifos attacks the nervous system of insects in the same way that sarin gas kills humans, and despite claims that exposure to the pesticide is safe in small doses, chlorpyrifos has been linked to serious birth defects in babies born to mothers exposed to the pesticide during pregnancy, including brain damage, loss of intellect, lowered IQ and developmental delays.
Since chlorpyrifos, marketed by Dow Chemical Co., became the most widely used insect killer in the United States, there have been a number of measures to eliminate, phase out and modify certain uses of the pesticide. In 1996, more stringent safety standards were enacted to address certain health and environmental risks from exposure to the pesticide, especially among children. In 2000, most home uses of chlorpyrifos were discontinued, and in 2002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) updated the chlorpyrifos label to include improved safety measures to protect the environment and individuals applying the pesticide. In 2014, the EPA completed a revised human health risk assessment for chlorpyrifos use, factoring in exposures from inhaling the pesticide, direct contact with skin and exposures from food and water among all populations, including women of childbearing age.
“In 1995, the EPA fined Dow Chemical $732,000 for withholding information about more than 200 reports of poisonings related to chlorpyrifos, and five years later, the company eliminated the use of chlorpyrifos in household products. Then, in 2003, Dow was ordered to pay a $2 million penalty for illegally making false safety claims about its pesticide products in advertisements that aired between 1995 and 2003.”
Chlorpyrifos has been used as a pesticide in the United States since 1965, and the current chlorpyrifos label requires workers handling and applying the pesticide to wear additional protective equipment and avoid entering treated fields for between 24 hours and five days. According to the EPA, chlorpyrifos can cause cholinesterase inhibition in humans, meaning the pesticide can overstimulate the nervous system and cause symptoms like dizziness, nausea, confusion, and at exceptionally high exposures, possibly even respiratory paralysis and death.
Although in-home use of chlorpyrifos has been restricted since 2000, the pesticide is still widely used in agriculture and poses a serious risk for individuals who work in or live in close proximity to fields sprayed with chlorpyrifos. Perhaps most concerning is the potential for women exposed to chlorpyrifos during pregnancy to give birth to babies with inhibited fetal brain development. According to reports, chlorpyrifos exposure in utero can result in the following birth defects:
In one study published in 2012, researchers wrote that “Prenatal exposure to chlorpyrifos (CPF), an organophosphate insecticide, is associated with neurobehavioral deficits in humans and animal models.” According to the findings of that study, there were “significant associations of prenatal exposure to a widely used environmental neurotoxicant, at standard use levels, with structural changes in the developing human brain.”
In 2014, an article published in The Atlantic wrote, “Forty-one million IQ points. That’s what Dr. David Bellinger determined Americans have collectively forfeited as a result of exposure to lead, mercury, and organophosphate pesticides.” According to the article, which quoted a 2012 paper comparing intelligence quotients (IQs) among children whose mothers were exposed to these neurotoxins during pregnancy, exposure to organophosphates like chlorpyrifos account for a total loss of 16.9 million IQ points.
Despite significant efforts in recent years to ban the potentially hazardous pesticide in the United States, chlorpyrifos is still allowed in agriculture, even though the pesticide is classified as “very highly toxic” to freshwater fish and birds, “moderately toxic” to mammals, and capable of causing “structural changes in the developing human brain.”
And while farmworkers and families living in close proximity to fields sprayed with chlorpyrifos are just now learning about the potential for the pesticide to cause birth defects in babies exposed to chlorpyrifos in utero, Dow Chemical has known for decades about the health risks of chlorpyrifos exposure. In 1995, the EPA fined Dow Chemical $732,000 for withholding information about more than 200 reports of poisonings related to chlorpyrifos, and five years later, the company eliminated the use of chlorpyrifos in household products. Then, in 2003, Dow was ordered to pay a $2 million penalty for illegally making false safety claims about its pesticide products in advertisements that aired between 1995 and 2003.
Still, chlorpyrifos continued to be heavily applied in agricultural and commercial uses in the United States for years, exposing adults, children and developing fetuses alike to adverse side effects. In 2018, a three-judge panel finally ordered the EPA to ban chlorpyrifos use in the United States within 60 days. However, the EPA appealed the decision and the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is now reconsidering the ruling.
]]>